
Tehran: Success of negotiations with America is conditional on halting excessive demands
Tehran sets conditions for the success of US-Iranian negotiations
The Iranian Foreign Ministry recently asserted that a positive trajectory and the success of US-Iranian negotiations fundamentally depend on the United States abandoning what it termed its "excessive demands." These statements come amidst intensive diplomatic efforts aimed at resolving outstanding issues between Washington and Tehran, which cast a shadow over regional and international stability.
Diplomatic marathon in Islamabad
In further developments on the diplomatic front, Iranian state media reported that peace talks and negotiations between the United States and Iran, hosted by the Pakistani capital Islamabad, are scheduled to resume later on Sunday. This resumption follows a grueling marathon round of negotiations that lasted nearly 15 hours, reflecting the complexity and number of issues on the table.
In this context, the Iranian news agency Tasnim reported that "15 hours of marathon talks concluded successfully on the first day of negotiations between Iran and the United States in Islamabad." Meanwhile, the Iranian news agency Mehr indicated that the next, crucial round of these negotiations would convene immediately after sunrise the following day, suggesting the parties' eagerness to reach concrete agreements.
The historical context of negotiations between Washington and Tehran
To understand the nature of these “excessive demands” that Tehran speaks of, it is necessary to return to the historical context of relations between the two countries. Since the United States’ unilateral withdrawal from the nuclear agreement (the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action) in 2018 during the administration of former President Donald Trump, and the imposition of a “maximum pressure” campaign, relations have witnessed unprecedented tension. Since the administration of President Joe Biden took office, several rounds of indirect talks have taken place in various capitals, such as Vienna, Doha, and Muscat, with the aim of reviving the agreement. Disagreements often revolve around lifting economic sanctions, obtaining US guarantees against future withdrawal, and issues related to regional security and freedom of navigation in sensitive waterways such as the Strait of Hormuz.
The importance and expected impact of the talks' outcomes
hold The US-Iranian negotiations immense strategic importance that extends beyond the borders of both countries, encompassing local, regional, and international implications. Domestically, in Iran, lifting sanctions represents a lifeline for an economy grappling with inflation and currency devaluation. Regionally, any rapprochement or understanding between Washington and Tehran will directly contribute to reducing tensions in the Middle East, particularly concerning maritime security in the Arabian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz, through which a significant portion of the world's energy supplies pass.
Internationally, the international community, including European powers, Russia, and China, is closely monitoring these talks. Any agreement would restore millions of barrels of Iranian oil to global markets, potentially stabilizing energy prices that have been impacted by successive geopolitical crises. Ultimately, the success of these diplomatic efforts hinges on the willingness of both sides to make mutual concessions and reach a balance that satisfies shared interests without crossing either side's red lines.



