
Trump announces the start of sanctions against Iran to prevent it from acquiring nuclear weapons
Details of Trump's announcement of the start of the embargo on Iran
In a significant development on the international political scene, former US President Donald Trump announced the implementation of a strict embargo on Iran, according to a breaking news report by Al Arabiya. These statements underscore Trump's continued hardline approach toward Tehran, emphasizing the need to curtail its capabilities and prevent it from achieving its nuclear ambitions at any cost.
In his remarks, Trump explained that he had received a phone call that morning from "the right people" to discuss the Iranian issue, emphasizing his firm commitment to preventing Tehran from acquiring weapons of mass destruction. He stated unequivocally, "We will not allow a country that has been causing trouble for 47 years to possess a nuclear weapon," a clear reference to the long history of tensions between Washington and Tehran spanning decades.
A firm stance and economic paralysis
Trump added, boasting about his political record, "I'm the one who stood up to Iran, unlike the others," indicating that previous US presidents had not taken such decisive and forceful action against Tehran as he had during his administration. He emphasized the profound impact of his policies, saying, "Iran isn't doing any business now," highlighting the crippling economic isolation the country is suffering as a result of the sanctions.
Historical context: Maximum pressure campaign
To understand the dimensions of this siege, one must return to the historical context of US-Iranian relations. The roots of modern tensions can be traced back to 1979, which explains Trump's reference to "47 years of trouble." But the most significant escalation occurred in 2018 when Trump announced the unilateral withdrawal of the United States from the Iran nuclear agreement (the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action), signed in 2015. Following the withdrawal, the US administration launched what became known as the "maximum pressure campaign," which included imposing unprecedented economic sanctions targeting Iran's oil, banking, and shipping sectors, with the aim of forcing Tehran to negotiate a new and more comprehensive agreement.
Expected effects of the blockade (locally, regionally and internationally)
Domestically (within Iran): The US embargo and sanctions have had disastrous consequences for the Iranian economy. The local currency (the rial) has lost a significant portion of its value, and inflation and unemployment rates have soared to unprecedented levels. Secondary sanctions have also led to the withdrawal of major international companies from the Iranian market, halting foreign investment and making it difficult for Tehran to export its oil, the lifeblood of its economy.
Regionally, this embargo is of paramount importance to the Middle East. By cutting off Iranian funding, Washington aims to limit Tehran's ability to support its proxies and affiliated armed groups in countries such as Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Yemen. This approach is widely welcomed by Washington's traditional allies in the region, who view Iranian influence as a direct threat to their national security and regional stability.
On the international level, the policy of embargo and sanctions has created a rift in relations between the United States and its European allies, who have tried to preserve the nuclear agreement. In turn, this economic pressure has pushed Iran to strengthen its strategic and economic ties with Eastern powers such as China and Russia to circumvent the sanctions. Global energy markets are also watching these developments very closely, given Iran's strategic location and its control of the Strait of Hormuz, through which a large portion of the world's oil supply passes.
In conclusion, Trump’s statements regarding the blockade on Iran reflect a continuation of the big stick policy, keeping the Middle East region in a state of constant anticipation of the outcomes of this complex geopolitical conflict and its effects on international peace and security.



