In decisive remarks reflecting the European stance calling for de-escalation, French President Emmanuel Macron affirmed that war and military operations that the United States and Israel might launch against Tehran would not resolve the Iranian nuclear issue. Speaking to reporters on the sidelines of an official visit to Seoul, South Korea, Macron stressed that there is no alternative to dialogue, urging the international community to engage in "in-depth negotiations" to ensure regional stability. He clarified that any targeted military strike, even if lasting only a few weeks, would not provide a fundamental and lasting solution to the nuclear crisis.
To understand the dimensions of this situation, it is necessary to return to the historical context of the crisis. Since the United States’ unilateral withdrawal in 2018 from the 2015 nuclear agreement (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action), tensions have escalated to unprecedented levels. This withdrawal and the reimposition of economic sanctions led Tehran to gradually reduce its nuclear commitments, presenting the international community with major security challenges. France, as a signatory to the agreement, believes that the absence of a diplomatic and technical framework will inevitably lead to a renewed deterioration of the situation within months or years, emphasizing that the comprehensive agreement is the only guarantee for a long-term commitment that preserves peace and stability for all.
Risks of military operations in the Strait of Hormuz
In his remarks, the French president addressed a highly sensitive issue concerning maritime security, describing any military operation aimed at "liberating" the Strait of Hormuz as "unrealistic." The Strait of Hormuz is of paramount strategic and economic importance, as approximately one-fifth of the world's oil production passes through it, making any conflict there a major shock to the global economy. Macron noted that some voices, particularly in the United States, are calling for the use of force in the Strait, warning that such an approach would be protracted and would expose shipping to direct threats from the Iranian Revolutionary Guard. It is worth noting that Tehran possesses a large arsenal of ballistic missiles and asymmetric military capabilities that would enable it to inflict significant damage in the event of any regional confrontation.
Sharp criticism of US policies and their impact on NATO
On the subject of international alliances, Macron strongly criticized US President Donald Trump, accusing him of emptying NATO of its substance. He explained that sowing daily doubts about Washington's commitment to its allies seriously weakens the alliance. Macron stated clearly: "If we sow doubt every day about our commitment, we empty it of its substance." He argued that the erratic statements of US officials create a climate of global uncertainty and damage mutual trust among Western allies.
Macron concluded his remarks by emphasizing that the world, and especially the Middle East, desperately needs stability, calm, and a return to the path of peace. He stressed the necessity of approaching international crises with seriousness, noting that diplomatic positions must be consistent and credible, rather than shifting statements and stances overnight. This French position reflects a broader European desire to avoid being drawn into a devastating regional war whose repercussions could extend to global energy security, thus underscoring that diplomacy remains the safest and most effective option.
